← Accueil

1. Corporate & IP Landscape

Vivendi Group, Universal Music, and the SACEM Ecosystem

Hypothetical Framework — Prepared by Adservio Innovation Lab Olivier Vitrac (former Research Director, Université Paris-Saclay) For internal discussion — November 2025


Disclaimer

This memo is constructed from limited initial keywords (Vivendi, IP, SACEM) and publicly available information. It represents a working hypothesis to structure strategic discussion with Vivendi's CTO. Claims regarding internal processes, technology stacks, or business priorities should be validated during the meeting.


1.1 Vivendi Group: Recent Corporate Evolution

Historical Context

Vivendi SE has undergone significant structural transformations over the past decade, driven by strategic divestitures and sector consolidation:

Current Structure (as of 2025, hypothetical understanding)

The Vivendi constellation now includes:

EntitySectorIP Stakes
Universal Music Group (UMG)Music publishing, recordingMasters, compositions, neighboring rights
Canal+ GroupAudiovisual, broadcastingFilm rights, TV formats, sports broadcasting
HavasAdvertising, communicationsBrand assets, campaign IP
Gameloft / Vivendi GamingInteractive entertainmentGame IP, character licenses
EditisPublishingLiterary rights, translations

Vivendi SE
(Holding)

Universal Music Group
(Music IP)

Canal+ Group
(Audiovisual IP)

Havas
(Brand IP)

Vivendi Gaming
(Interactive IP)

Editis
(Literary IP)

Interacts with SACEM
(royalty collection)

Distribution Platforms
(Netflix, YouTube, etc.)

Strategic Implications

The fragmentation of Vivendi creates both opportunities and risks for IP management:


1.2 Universal Music Group and SACEM

UMG's Position in the Music Industry

Universal Music Group is the world's largest music company, representing:

The SACEM Connection

SACEM (Société des Auteurs, Compositeurs et Éditeurs de Musique) is France's collective rights management organization (CMO) for musical works:

registers work

co-registers

licenses

usage reports

distributes royalties

distributes royalties

separate flow

direct licensing

Songwriter/Composer

SACEM
(CMO)

Publisher
(e.g., UMPG)

Platforms
(Spotify, YouTube, Radio)

Universal Music
(Label/Master Owner)

Key Distinctions

Rights TypeOwnerCollection Mechanism
Composition rights (musical work)Songwriter, publisherSACEM (performance, mechanical)
Master rights (sound recording)Label (e.g., UMG)Direct licensing or PPL-equivalent
Neighboring rights (performer)ArtistADAMI, SPEDIDAM (France)

Implication: Vivendi (via UMG) has a dual stake in SACEM's ecosystem:

  1. As a publisher, it co-owns composition rights and relies on SACEM for collection.

  2. As a label, it negotiates directly with platforms but depends on SACEM's detection accuracy to avoid under-compensation of composers.


1.3 The IP Challenge in a Post-Fingerprint World

Current State: Declarative + Metadata Hybrid

SACEM's royalty distribution relies on:

A. Declarative Registration

B. Automated Detection (Platform-Driven)

AI Model / User RemixPlatform (Spotify)SACEM RegistryPublisher (UMPG)SongwriterAI Model / User RemixPlatform (Spotify)SACEM RegistryPublisher (UMPG)Songwriter⚠️ AI transformationsoften evade fingerprintsRegister work (ISWC, metadata)Declare ownership splitProvide reference fingerprintsUser uploads trackFingerprint matchingUser uploads AI remix (pitch-shifted, re-encoded)Fingerprint matching (degraded)Usage report (plays, partial matches)Royalty payment (if matched)Royalty payment (if matched)

Failure Modes

  1. Metadata Stripping: When files are ripped, converted, or uploaded without ID3 tags, SACEM loses declarative trail.

  2. Fingerprint Drift: AI remixing (pitch shift, time stretch, stem separation) breaks acoustic fingerprints.

  3. Synthetic Derivatives: Generative models (MusicLM, Suno, etc.) produce outputs that sound similar but have no direct signal match.

  4. Cross-Border Complexity: SACEM's reach is limited outside France; international platforms may under-report.

Strategic Question for Vivendi/CTO

Given that UMG depends on SACEM's accuracy for composition royalties, and given that AI is eroding fingerprint reliability, what technical or organizational measures could Vivendi champion to preserve monetization in the next 5–10 years?


1.4 Regulatory and Market Context

EU AI Act (2024–2025)

Market Dynamics

Vivendi IP Strategy

Preserve SACEM efficacy

Direct platform licensing

AI provenance audits?

Market Forces

Streaming Growth
(Spotify, Apple Music)

Short-Form Video
(TikTok, Reels)

AI Music Tools
(Suno, MusicLM, Udio)

Regulatory Pressures

EU Copyright Directive
(Article 17)

EU AI Act
(training data transparency)

National CMO laws
(SACEM mandate)


1.5 Hypotheses for Discussion

Based on this landscape analysis, we propose the following working hypotheses for the CTO meeting:

  1. Vivendi's IP vulnerability is proportional to AI's ability to evade fingerprints. → If SACEM cannot detect remixed works, UMG loses composition royalties.

  2. The split of Vivendi entities complicates unified IP defense. → Canal+ (video), UMG (music), Gameloft (games) may face similar AI challenges but lack coordinated detection infrastructure.

  3. SACEM's hybrid model (declarative + automated) is under stress. → Declarative works when metadata is intact; automation works when signals are unaltered. AI breaks both.

  4. Regulatory tailwinds exist (EU AI Act, Art. 17), but enforcement is unclear. → Vivendi could position itself as a pilot partner for AI provenance standards.

  5. Blockchain or hybrid registries could complement SACEM. → Not as a replacement, but as a cryptographic audit layer for high-value works.


1.6 Next Steps

The following memos will explore:


End of Memo 1 Prepared by Adservio Innovation Lab — Hypothetical Framework Contact: olivier.vitrac@adservio.fr